Home
»
Ethics of Employment Screening for Psychopathy
Ethics of Employment Screening for Psychopathy
Regular price
€97.99
603 verified reviews
100% verified
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
Our Delivery Time Frames Explained
2-4 Working Days: Available in-stock
14-28 Working Days: On Backorder
Will Deliver When Available: On Pre-Order or Reprinting
We ship your order once all items have arrived at our warehouse and are processed. Need those 2-4 day shipping items sooner? Just place a separate order for them!
Close
A01=Brian K. Steverson
ADA medical testing
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Brian K. Steverson
automatic-update
business ethics
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HPQ
Category=HPS
Category=JMP
Category=QDTQ
Category=QDTS
COP=United States
corporate psychopaths
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
employment equal opportunity
employment ethics
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Language_English
PA=Available
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Active
softlaunch
workplace privacy
workplace psychopaths
Product details
- ISBN 9781793616821
- Weight: 395g
- Dimensions: 161 x 228mm
- Publication Date: 14 Oct 2020
- Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Hardback
- Language: English
In 2006, Babiak and Hare alerted the public to the danger of “corporate psychopaths,” psychopathic individuals occupying positions of power in business organizations. Since then, academicians and the public media have advertised their presence, documented the harm they can cause, and issued a call to arms to identify corporate psychopaths and eliminate their presence in the workplace. Very little attention has been paid, however, to the ethics of such a “seek and destroy” mission. The Ethics of Employment Screening for Psychopathy argues that employment screening for psychopathy would be illegal and unethical. On legal grounds, Brian K Steverson argues that psychopathy would qualify as a protected disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act, and, hence, medical screening to identify potential corporate psychopaths would be in violation of the ADA. On ethical grounds, the case is made that such screening would violate a social commitment to equal opportunity, would constitute a morally unjustified violation of personal privacy, and would, in practice, not produce the intended benefits, while at the same time inflicting harm on the subjects of the screening.
Brian K. Steverson is John L. Aram Chair in Business Ethics in the School of Business Administration at Gonzaga University.
Ethics of Employment Screening for Psychopathy
€97.99
