Justification of Responsibility in the UN Security Council

Regular price €55.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Holger Niemann
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Holger Niemann
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=GTF
Category=GTJ
Category=GTP
Category=GTU
Category=JPS
collective decision making
COP=United Kingdom
Council Members
Council Responsibility
delegitimation
Delivery_Pre-order
Double Veto
Draft Resolution
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
global cooperation
global governance
International Humanitarian Law
international law
international organisations
international relations
international security
Iraq
Iraq Crisis
Iraqi Material Breach
justice theory
justification
Language_English
legitimacy theory
Lyall Grant
Material Breach
non-Council Members
Norm Contestation
Normative Controversy
normative order negotiation in crises
Normative Worth
P5 Member
PA=Temporarily unavailable
Post-conflict Peacebuilding Processes
Practice Theory Perspective
pragmatist sociology
Price_€20 to €50
PS=Active
Public Council Meeting
Rhetorical Repertoires
Security Council case studies
Security Council Responsibility
softlaunch
Syria
Syria Crisis
Syrian Government
Transnational Security Threats
UN Security Council
Weapons Inspectors
WPS Agendum

Product details

  • ISBN 9780367504809
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 04 Mar 2020
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

The UN Security Council has been given the primary responsibility for maintaining international peace and security. The precise meaning of this responsibility, however, is contested. This lack of clarity is frequently criticised as a source of incoherent and selective decision-making, undermining the legitimacy of the Security Council. In case studies of the Security Council’s controversies on Iraq and Syria, this book instead reveals contestation and competing interpretations of responsibility as crucial conditions for the constitution and negotiation of normative order. The case studies also underline the importance of public Security Council meetings as dynamic sites for coping with a plurality of normative orders and how their symbolic and material manifestations shape processes of collective legitimation. This book concludes that these processes demonstrate the crucial role of justification and critique as practices of normative ordering in the Security Council.

The Justification of Responsibility in the UN Security Council argues that normative orders in international organisations are constructed by multifaceted processes of questioning, reaffirming and coordinating claims of normativity and legitimacy. Connecting research on norms and legitimacy in international relations with pragmatist sociology, the book provides an account of the complexities and inconsistencies of decision-making processes and their normative foundations in international organisations. This book will be of interest to scholars and students of international organisations, international relations theory and global governance.

The Open Access version of this book, available at http://www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives (CC-BY-ND) 4.0 license.

Holger Niemann is a researcher at the Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (IFSH). He is also an Associate Fellow of the Institute for Development and Peace at the University of Duisburg-Essen (INEF) and holds a PhD in political science.

More from this author