A01=Jack Knight
A01=James Johnson
Activism
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Agency (sociology)
Ambiguity
Author_Jack Knight
Author_James Johnson
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=JPHV
Causality
Coase theorem
Competition
Consequentialism
Consideration
Contingency (philosophy)
Convention (norm)
COP=United States
Criticism
Decentralization
Decision-making
Deliberation
Deliberative democracy
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
Democracy
Determination
Dichotomy
Effectiveness
Election
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=0
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Equal opportunity
Experiment
Explanation
Governance
Government
Ideal type
Ideology
Implementation
Incentive compatibility
Inefficiency
Inquiry
Institution
Interdependence
Language_English
Legitimacy (political)
Majority rule
Modernity
Morality
Negotiation
Norm (social)
Obstacle
PA=Available
Participant
Persuasion
Policy
Political agenda
Political freedom
Political philosophy
Politician
Politics
Pragmatism
Presumption (canon law)
Price_€20 to €50
Principal-agent problem
Principle
PS=Active
Public policy
Rational choice theory
Rationality
Representative democracy
Requirement
Result
Rule of law
Skepticism
Social choice theory
softlaunch
State actor
Suggestion
The Public and its Problems
Theory
Trade-off
Unrestricted domain
Utilitarianism
Voting
Wealth
Product details
- ISBN 9780691163338
- Weight: 510g
- Dimensions: 152 x 235mm
- Publication Date: 03 Nov 2014
- Publisher: Princeton University Press
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Paperback
- Language: English
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
Pragmatism and its consequences are central issues in American politics today, yet scholars rarely examine in detail the relationship between pragmatism and politics. In The Priority of Democracy, Jack Knight and James Johnson systematically explore the subject and make a strong case for adopting a pragmatist approach to democratic politics--and for giving priority to democracy in the process of selecting and reforming political institutions. What is the primary value of democracy? When should we make decisions democratically and when should we rely on markets? And when should we accept the decisions of unelected officials, such as judges or bureaucrats? Knight and Johnson explore how a commitment to pragmatism should affect our answers to such important questions. They conclude that democracy is a good way of determining how these kinds of decisions should be made--even if what the democratic process determines is that not all decisions should be made democratically. So, for example, the democratically elected U.S. Congress may legitimately remove monetary policy from democratic decision-making by putting it under the control of the Federal Reserve.
Knight and Johnson argue that pragmatism offers an original and compelling justification of democracy in terms of the unique contributions democratic institutions can make to processes of institutional choice. This focus highlights the important role that democracy plays, not in achieving consensus or commonality, but rather in addressing conflicts. Indeed, Knight and Johnson suggest that democratic politics is perhaps best seen less as a way of reaching consensus or agreement than as a way of structuring the terms of persistent disagreement.
Jack Knight is professor of political science and law at Duke University and the author of Institutions and Social Conflict. James Johnson is associate professor of political science at the University of Rochester and former editor of Perspectives on Politics.
