Proletarian Answer to the Modernist Question
Regular price
€32.50
14 days return policy
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Nick Hubble
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Nick Hubble
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=DSK
COP=United Kingdom
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
intersubjectivity
Language_English
mass observation
modernism
PA=Available
Price_€20 to €50
proletarian literature
PS=Active
public and private spheres
socialist realism
softlaunch
Product details
- ISBN 9781474444392
- Weight: 349g
- Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
- Publication Date: 26 Feb 2019
- Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
- Publication City/Country: GB
- Product Form: Paperback
- Language: English
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
Reformulates our understanding of the relationship between proletarian literature and modernism in Britain
This book argues that British proletarian literature was a politicised form of modernism which culturally transformed Britain. Critical analysis and close readings of key works such as D.H. Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover, Naomi Mitchison’s We have Been Warned, Lewis Grassic Gibbon’s A Scots Quair and John Sommerfield’s May Day, are placed within a literary history stretching from early encounters between Ford Madox Ford and D.H. Lawrence, through Virginia Woolf’s association with the Women’s Co-operative Guild, and on to the activity of Mass Observation in the late 1930s and 1940s. The study analyses the way in which modernism and proletarian literature were related to an intersectional web of class and gender that took on a potent political shape following the 1926 General Strike and the Equal Franchise Act of 1928. The 1930s is revealed not as an atypical, isolated decade but as central to the literature of the twentieth century.
Key Features
Relates modernism to the intersubjective dimension of societySets out a new perspective on proletarian literature in Britain, releasing it from limiting conceptions of working class authenticity or Soviet-imposed socialist realismShows how modernism and proletarian literature were linked products of the (broadly) fin-de-siècle emergence of the unconscious that fractured nineteenth-century grand narrativesProvides an historical framework for rethinking the 1930s as not an atypical isolated decade but as central to the literature of the twentieth century
Nick Hubble is Reader in English at Brunel University London.
