Supreme Court Footnote

Regular price €32.50
A01=Peter Charles Hoffer
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Alexander Dallas
Antonin Scalia
Author_Peter Charles Hoffer
automatic-update
Benjamin Cardozo
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=LA
Category=LNAA
Category=LNDH
Charles Evans Hughes
Comparative law
COP=United States
David Brewer
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
Earl Warren
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Friends of the Court briefs
Harlan Fiske Stone
Harvard Law Review
Horace Gray Code Napoleon
interesting supreme court cases
interesting supreme court cases recently
James Kent
James Wilson
John Paul Stevens
Joseph Story
Language_English
Law of Rental property
Louis Brandeis
Louis Lusky
Originalism
PA=Available
Plessy v. Ferguson
Price_€20 to €50
PS=Active
Roe v Wade
Roe v Wade 1973
Roe v Wade history
Roger Taney
softlaunch
supreme court decision
US Supreme Court
William Blackstone
William Cranch
Wong Kim Ark

Product details

  • ISBN 9781479830220
  • Weight: 531g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 18 Jun 2024
  • Publisher: New York University Press
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days

Our Delivery Time Frames Explained
2-4 Working Days: Available in-stock

10-20 Working Days: On Backorder

Will Deliver When Available: On Pre-Order or Reprinting

We ship your order once all items have arrived at our warehouse and are processed. Need those 2-4 day shipping items sooner? Just place a separate order for them!

A history of the humble footnote and its impact on the highest court in the land
In May 2022, a seismic legal event occurred as the draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health was leaked. The majority aimed to eliminate constitutional protection for abortion. Amidst the fervor, an unnoticed detail emerged: over 140 footnotes accompanied the majority opinion and dissent. These unassuming annotations held immense significance, unveiling justices’ beliefs about the Constitution’s essence, highlighting their controversial reasoning, and laying bare the vastly different interpretations of the role of Supreme Court Justice.
The Supreme Court Footnote offers a study of the evolution of footnotes in US Supreme Court opinions and how they add to our constitutional understanding. Through a comprehensive analysis, Peter Charles Hoffer argues that as justices alter the course of history via their decisions, they import their own understandings of it through the footnotes. The book showcases how the role of the footnote within Supreme Court opinions has evolved, beginning with one of the first cases in the history of the court, Chisholm v. Georgia in 1792 (a case concerning federalism vs. states’ rights) and ending with the landmark Dobbs v. Jackson case in 2022. Along the way, Hoffer demonstrates how the footnotes within these decisions reflect the changing role of the Supreme Court Justice, along with how interpretations of the constitution have transformed over time.
At once surprising and revealing, The Supreme Court Footnote proves that what appears below the line is not only a unique window into the history of constitutional law but also a source of insight as to how the court will act going forward.

Peter Charles Hoffer is Distinguished Research Professor of History at the University of Georgia. He has authored and co-authored more than twenty books, including Clio Among the Muses: Essays on History and the Humanities; The Historians' Paradox: The Study of History in Our Time; and The Clamor of Lawyers: The American Revolution and the Crisis in the Legal Profession.