Time, Space, and Number in Physics and Psychology

Regular price €71.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=William R. Uttal
Absolute Pitch
analytic
Author_William R. Uttal
behavioural science
Book III
cardinal
Category=JMB
Category=JMR
CIE Color Space
cognitive accessibility debate in psychology
cognitive mechanisms
conventional
Conventional Analytic Mathematics
Conventional Mathematics
cosmological
Cosmological Principle
Data Set
Elastic Distortion
empirical methodology
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
experimental inference
Figural Aftereffects
Group Size Differences
Inertial Frames
Instrumental Conditioning
Intermediate Hypothesis
Mathematical Expressions
mathematics
Mental Processes
Muller Lyer Illusion
philosophy of mind
physical
Physical Time
Power PC Theory
principle
psychological
psychological measurement
Psychological Science
ratio
scales
Temporal Order Judgments
Vice Versa
Weber's Law
Weber’s Law

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138839724
  • Weight: 294g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 11 Apr 2016
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

The crux of the debate between proponents of behavioral psychology and cognitive psychology focuses on the issue of accessibility. Cognitivists believe that mental mechanisms and processes are accessible, and that their inner workings can be inferred from experimental observations of behavior. Behaviorists, on the contrary, believe that mental processes and mechanisms are inaccessible, and that nothing important about them can be inferred from even the most cleverly designed empirical studies.

One argument that is repeatedly raised by cognitivists is that even though mental processes are not directly accessible, this should not be a barrier to unravelling the nature of the inner mental processes and mechanisms. Inference works for other sciences, such as physics, so why not psychology? If physics can work so successfully with their kind of inaccessibility to make enormous theoretical progress, then why not psychology?

As with most previous psychological debates, there is no "killer argument" that can provide an unambiguous resolution. In its absence, author William Uttal explores the differing properties of physical and psychological time, space, and mathematics before coming to the conclusion that there are major discrepancies between the properties of the respective subject matters that make the analogy of comparable inaccessibilities a false one.

More from this author