Tolstoy's 'What is Art?'

Regular price €61.50
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Terry Diffey
account
aesthetic theory
Anna Karenina
argument
art criticism
Art Tolstoy
Author_Terry Diffey
Category=DSA
Category=DSBF
Category=DSK
Category=QDTN
Category=QDTS
counterfeit
Counterfeit Art
Counterfeit Work
Dante's Poetry
didactic aesthetics
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
ethical standards in art analysis
evaluation of art
exclusive
Exclusive Art
Express Feelings
Expressing Men
Good Life
Henry King
Ints
moral philosophy
perception
religious
Religious Perception
Rockwell Kent
Russian intellectual history
sense
Social Exclusiveness
theory
Tolstoy's Account
Tolstoy's Argument
Tolstoy's Attack
Tolstoy's Essay
Tolstoy's Notion
Tolstoy's Position
Tolstoy's Sense
Tolstoy's Theory
Tolstoy's View
universal
view
Yasnaya Polyana
Young Men

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138803411
  • Weight: 330g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 18 Oct 2016
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

With its demand that works of art be judged according to the their morally didactic content, Tolstoy’s reviled aesthetics has seemed to exclude from the canon far too many works widely accepted as masterpieces, including Shakespeare and Beethoven.

This book, first published in 1985, argues that these are not mere oversights on the part of Tolstoy: he knew full well the consequences of his line of reasoning. The author contends that, even if we disagree with and eventually reject much of what Tolstoy concludes, his account of the nature and purpose of art is nevertheless worth consideration.

Diffey’s argument by no means accepts all of ‘What is Art?’, but by suggesting that the work is best interpreted as a counterpoint to the amoral aestheticism prevalent in Russia at the time, he does much to restore it to a status deserving attention, particularly in today’s climate of extreme relativism.

More from this author