Tragedy of Reason

Regular price €132.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=David Roochnik
Ancient Pagans
Aristotle
Ascent Passage
Author_David Roochnik
Category=QDHA
Category=QDTL
Derrida
Descartes
Determinate Subject Matter
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Follow
Free Originators
God's Eye Perspective
God’s Eye Perspective
Good Life
Heraclitus
Hesiod
Hesiod's Poem
Hesiod’s Poem
Homer
Human Beings
Human Significance
Indirect Argument
logocentrism
Logos
modern era
Neutral Items
Nietzsche
Philosophical Dialogue
Philosophical Logos
Plato
Platonic
Platonic Conception
Political Techne
Porty
Protagorean Relativism
Provisional Morality
Pyrrhonian Skepticism
Significant Discourse
Socratic Refutation
Stove Heated Room
The Birth of Tragedy
Tragic philosopher
Unconditionally Good
Winged Bees
Young Man

Product details

  • ISBN 9780367712402
  • Weight: 610g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 14 Apr 2021
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

The classical conception of reason (or logos) has been repeatedly attacked in the modern era. Its enemies range from Descartes, who complains that logos is not sufficiently useful or precise, to Derrida who hopes to liberate Western thought from its bondage to "logocentrism."

At least since the time of Nietzsche, Plato has been damned as the chief architect of the classical conception of logos. He is accused of overvaluing reason and thereby devaluing the other, more human aspects of life. As it was originally formulated in Nietzsche’s The Birth of Tragedy, Plato has been taken to be the arch-enemy of tragedy, which for Nietzsche was the most life-affirming of all the art forms of Greek culture.

Originally published in 1990, The Tragedy of Reason defends Plato against his accusers. Employing a mode of exposition which exhibits Plato’s position, Roochnik presents the Platonic conception of logos in confrontation with texts by Homer, Hesiod, Heraclitus, Aristotle, Descartes, Porty, and Derrida. In clear language, unencumbered by technical terminology, Roochnik shows that Platonic conception of logos is keenly aware of the strength of its opponents. The result is a presentation of Plato as a "tragic philosopher" whose conception of logos is characterized by an affirmation of its own limits as well as its goodness.

David Roochnik

More from this author