Uncertain Bioethics

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Stephen Napier
abortion
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
ALS Patient
apparent competency
Author_Stephen Napier
automatic-update
bioethics
Bodily Rights
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HPQ
Category=PSAD
Category=QDTQ
Commutative Justice
Competent Refusal
COP=United States
covert consciousness
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
dignity
Disability Bias
DNR Order
end-of-life ethics
Epistemic Circularity
epistemic diffidence
epistemic justification
Epistemic Peers
epistemic risk in medical decision-making
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_science
Equal Weight View
euthanasia
harming
High IQ Group
human subjects
Innocent Human
intrinsic dignity
IQ Group
IVF Clinic
killing
Language_English
Low IQ Group
MCS
MCS Patient
Moral Foundations Theory
moral judgment
Moral Perception
moral psychology
PA=Available
patient autonomy
peer disagreement
pragmatic encroachment
Price_€100 and above
PS=Active
PVS Patient
risky research
softlaunch
stem cell research
Stephen Napier
Totipotent Cell
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Twinning Argument
Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cells
Unborn Human Beings
Young Man

Product details

  • ISBN 9780815372981
  • Weight: 550g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 02 Sep 2019
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Inc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Bioethics is a field of inquiry and as such is fundamentally an epistemic discipline. Knowing how we make moral judgments can bring into relief why certain arguments on various bioethical issues appear plausible to one side and obviously false to the other. Uncertain Bioethics makes a significant and distinctive contribution to the bioethics literature by culling the insights from contemporary moral psychology to highlight the epistemic pitfalls and distorting influences on our apprehension of value. Stephen Napier also incorporates research from epistemology addressing pragmatic encroachment and the significance of peer disagreement to justify what he refers to as epistemic diffidence when one is considering harming or killing human beings. Napier extends these developments to the traditional bioethical notion of dignity and argues that beliefs subject to epistemic diffidence should not be acted upon. He proceeds to apply this framework to traditional and developing issues in bioethics including abortion, stem cell research, euthanasia, decision-making for patients in a minimally conscious state, and risky research on competent human subjects.

Stephen Napier is an associate professor of philosophy at Villanova University. His previous publications include Virtue Epistemology: Motivation and Knowledge, and he edited Persons, Moral Worth, and Embryos. His interests include epistemology, bioethics, and the metaphysics of persons.

More from this author