Undervalued Dissent

Regular price €90.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Manjusha Nair
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Manjusha Nair
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=JPW
Category=KNXB2
Category=KNXU
COP=United States
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
eq_bestseller
eq_business-finance-law
eq_isMigrated=0
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Language_English
PA=To order
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Active
softlaunch

Product details

  • ISBN 9781438462455
  • Weight: 472g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 01 Dec 2016
  • Publisher: State University of New York Press
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Uses two case studies to demonstrate how neoliberal reforms in India have de-democratized labor politics.

Honorable Mention, 2018 Global Division Book Award presented by the Global Division of the Society for the Study of Social Problems

Historically, the Indian state has not offered welfare and social rights to all of its citizens, yet a remarkable characteristic of its polity has been the ability of citizens to dissent in a democratic way. In Undervalued Dissent, Manjusha Nair argues that this democratic space has been vanishing slowly. Based on extensive fieldwork in Chhattisgarh, a regional state in central India, this book examines two different informal workers' movements. Informal workers are not part of organized labor unions and make up eighty-five percent of the Indian workforce. The first movement started in 1977 and was a success, while the other movement began in 1989 and still continues today, without success. The workers in both movements had similar backgrounds, skills, demands, and strategies. Nair maintains that the first movement succeeded because the workers contended within a labor regime that allowed space for democratic dissent, and the second movement failed because they contested within a widely altered labor regime following neoliberal reforms, where these spaces of democratic dissent were preempted. The key difference between the two regimes, Nair suggests, is not in the withdrawal of a prolabor state from its protective and regulatory role, as has been argued by many, but rather in the rise of a new kind of state that became functionally decentralized, economically predatory, and politically communalized. These changes, Nair concludes, successfully de-democratized labor politics in India.

Manjusha Nair is Assistant Professor of Sociology at the National University of Singapore.

More from this author