Well-Founded Belief

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
Andrew Moon
Basing Relation
belief evaluation
Berit Brogaard
biscopic account
Category=QDTK
Category=QDTM
Category=QDTQ
Causal Account
causal belief
Causal Deviance
Christoph Kelp
composite view
Constituent M1
deontology
Deviant Causal Chains
dispositions
Doxastic Accounts
doxastic attitudes
Doxastic Justification
Duncan Pritchard
Epistemic Agency
Epistemic Basing
epistemic basing relation analysis
epistemic belief
Epistemic Conservatism
epistemic disjunctivism
Epistemic Grounding
Epistemic Injustice
epistemic justification
epistemic location
Epistemic Reasons
Epistemological Disjunctivism
epistemological theories
epistemology
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Errol Lord
evidence
Evidential Considerations
experimental evidence
Guy Axtell
Hamid Vahid
Harmen Ghijsen
hermeneutical injustice
Higher Order Evidence
Inductive Risk
inference
inferential reasoning
J. Adam Carter
Jesper Kallestrup
John Turri
Justified Belief
Keith Korcz
Kevin McCain
knowledge-how
knowledge-that
Kurt Sylvan
Luca Moretti
Miriam McCormick
Miss Improper
Mona Simion
Patrick Bondy
phenomenal basing
Phenomenal Character
phenomenal dogmatism
Positive Epistemic Status
practical reasons
Proper Basing
Propositional Justification
propositional knowledge
radical scepticism
radical skepticism
Ram Neta
rational omnipotence
reason attributions
Ru Ye
speckled hen
Stephen Hetherington
Tommaso Piazza
well-founded belief

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138503755
  • Weight: 600g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 13 Dec 2019
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Epistemological theories of knowledge and justification draw a crucial distinction between one’s simply having good reasons for some belief and one’s actually basing one’s belief on good reasons. While the most natural kind of account of basing is causal in nature—a belief is based on a reason if and only if the belief is properly caused by the reason—there is hardly any widely accepted, counterexample-free account of the basing relation among contemporary epistemologists. Further inquiry into the nature of the basing relation is therefore of paramount importance for epistemology. Without an acceptable account of the basing relation, epistemological theories remain both crucially incomplete and vulnerable to errors that can arise when authors assume an implausible view of what it takes for beliefs to be held on the basis of reasons.

Well-Founded Belief brings together 16 essays written by leading epistemologists to explore this important topic in greater detail. The chapters in this collection are divided into two broad categories: (i) the nature of the basing relation; and (ii) basing and its applications. The chapters in the first section are concerned, principally, with positively characterizing the epistemic basing relation and criticizing extant accounts of it, including extant accounts of the relationship between epistemic basing and propositional and doxastic justification. The latter chapters connect epistemic basing with other topics of interest in epistemology as well as ethics, including: epistemic disjunctivism, epistemic injustice, agency, epistemic conservativism, epistemic grounding, epistemic genealogy, practical reasoning, and practical knowledge.

J. Adam Carter is a lecturer in philosophy at the University of Glasgow, UK. His work has appeared in Noûs, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Analysis, Philosophical Studies, and the Australasian Journal of Philosophy. He is the author of Metaepistemology and Relativism (2016).

Patrick Bondy is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Wichita State University. His work has appeared in Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, Dialogue, Philosophia, and Episteme. He is the author of Epistemic Rationality and Epistemic Normativity (2018).