What If There Were No Significance Tests?

Regular price €248.00
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
alternative hypothesis evaluation
Analysis of Covariance
Analysis of Variance
ANCOVA
ANOVA
Bayesian Methods
Bayesian statistics
Beta Distribution
Category=GPS
Category=PBT
Ceteris Paribus Clauses
confidence intervals
Confidence Limit
Credible Interval
Crud Factor
data visualization methods
Dichotomous Decision
Effect Size
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Estimation
Evaluation of Statistical Models
Exact Confidence Intervals
Goodness of Approximation
Hypothesis Testing
Interval Estimation
IQ Point
Linear Model
NHST
Nil Hypotheses
Noncentrality Parameter
Null Hypotheses
Null Hypothesis
null hypothesis testing
philosophy of science
Population Effect Size
Posterior Distribution
Power
Prespecified Range
Prior Distribution
Regression
Reliability
replication crisis
Sample Sizes
Significance Testing
Significance Tests
Spontaneous Recovery
Squared Multiple Correlation
t-Tests
Uniform Prior Distribution
Validity
Vice Versa

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138892460
  • Weight: 980g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 16 Mar 2016
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

The classic edition of What If There Were No Significance Tests? highlights current statistical inference practices. Four areas are featured as essential for making inferences: sound judgment, meaningful research questions, relevant design, and assessing fit in multiple ways. Other options (data visualization, replication or meta-analysis), other features (mediation, moderation, multiple levels or classes), and other approaches (Bayesian analysis, simulation, data mining, qualitative inquiry) are also suggested.

The Classic Edition’s new Introduction demonstrates the ongoing relevance of the topic and the charge to move away from an exclusive focus on NHST, along with new methods to help make significance testing more accessible to a wider body of researchers to improve our ability to make more accurate statistical inferences. Part 1 presents an overview of significance testing issues. The next part discusses the debate in which significance testing should be rejected or retained. The third part outlines various methods that may supplement significance testing procedures. Part 4 discusses Bayesian approaches and methods and the use of confidence intervals versus significance tests. The book concludes with philosophy of science perspectives.

Rather than providing definitive prescriptions, the chapters are largely suggestive of general issues, concerns, and application guidelines. The editors allow readers to choose the best way to conduct hypothesis testing in their respective fields. For anyone doing research in the social sciences, this book is bound to become "must" reading. Ideal for use as a supplement for graduate courses in statistics or quantitative analysis taught in psychology, education, business, nursing, medicine, and the social sciences, the book also benefits independent researchers in the behavioral and social sciences and those who teach statistics.

Lisa L. Harlow is Professor of Psychology at the University of Rhode Island. She is the Editor of Psychological Methods and a past president of the American Psychological Association‘s Division 5. Stanley A. Mulaik is Professor Emeritus of Psychology at Georgia Institute of Technology. His research interests include philosophy of statistics and causality and objectivity. James H. Steiger is Professor of Psychology and Human Development at Vanderbilt University. His research interests include the use of confidence intervals to evaluate the fit of statistical models.