What Is at Stake in Building “Non-Western” International Relations Theory?

Regular price €72.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Yong-Soo Eun
academic marginalisation
American IR
Analytical Eclecticism
Author_Yong-Soo Eun
Broaden IR
Category=GTM
Category=JP
Category=JPS
Chinese IR
Chinese IR Scholar
Chinese IR Theory
Constructivist IR Theory
Contemporary IR
cross-cultural dialogue
Current Parochialism
disciplinary pluralism
epistemological diversity
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Global IR
IR Community
IR Scholar
IR Teaching
IR Theory
IR Theory Building
knowledge production processes
Major Theoretical Paradigms
Mao Zedong
non-western theory development in IR
post-positivist
Post-positivist Research
Post-positivist Scholarship
Qin Yaqing
reflexive agency
scholarship
South Korea's Foreign Policy
South Korean Foreign Policy
South Korean National Identity
South Korea’s Foreign Policy
United States Japan South Korea
Zhao Tingyang

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138282544
  • Weight: 272g
  • Dimensions: 138 x 216mm
  • Publication Date: 16 Jan 2018
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

International Relations (IR) as a discipline is often deemed to be “too Western” centric. It has been argued that much of mainstream IR theory is “simply an abstraction of Western history.” In this respect, many IR scholars have called for “broadening” the theoretical horizon of IR while problematising the Western parochialism of the discipline, and it is increasingly acknowledged that IR needs to embrace a wider range of histories, experiences, and theoretical perspectives, particularly those outside of the West. However, despite such a meaningful debate over broadening the theoretical and practical horizons of IR, several critical questions remain unclear and under-explored. For example, does IR need to embrace pluralism? If so, how much? To what extent, and in what sense, is IR parochial? Should IR promote dialogue across theoretical and spatial divides? If so, how? Yong-Soo Eun addresses these questions. He undertakes a literature review and an empirical analysis of the extent to which the field has actually become diverse and pluralistic. This investigation considers diversity beyond the current limited focus on the geographical origins of theory. Yong-Soo also draws attention to the mechanisms and processes of knowledge production and transmission in IR. More importantly, he addresses what is probably the most acute issue associated with the “non-Western” IR theory-building enterprise; namely, fragmentation and dialogue. In conclusion, Yong-Soo notes that the role of unsettling the present hierarchical structure of the discipline falls to reflexive individual agents. He argues that in order for their agential power to be more fully harnessed in the opening up of IR, critical “self”-reflection and “collective” empathy and collaboration among marginalised scholars are all essential.

Yong-Soo Eun is Associate Professor of Political Science and International Studies at Hanyang University (HYU), Seoul. Before joining HYU, he taught at the University of Warwick in the UK. He has published articles in scholarly journals, including Review of International Studies, International Studies Perspectives, and PS: Political Science and Politics. Yong-Soo is broadly interested in IR theory and the international politics of the Asia-Pacific region.

More from this author