What Makes a Philosopher Great?

Regular price €51.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
Allen Wood
Aristotle's Commitment
Aristotle’s Commitment
Bell Stands
case studies in philosophical achievement
Category=NHC
Category=QDH
Category=QDHA
Category=QDHF
Category=QDTJ
Category=QDTK
Category=QDTQ
Category=QRAB
Cheryl Misak
Closed Plane Figures
comparative philosophy
Constant Conjunction
David Bronstein
David Macarthur
Don Garrett
Empirical Deduction
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Gary Hatfield
Gm Preface
Great Moral Philosopher
greatness
history of ideas
Hume's Inductive Skepticism
Hume’s Inductive Skepticism
Immaterial Entities
Indefinite Dyad
Infinite Divisibility
infused
Infused Virtue
Intentional Species
Jeffrey Hause
Jonardon Ganeri
Kant's Question
Kant’s Question
Karen Detlefsen
Karyn Lai
Ken Gemes
Lloyd P. Gerson
metaphilosophy
metaphysical inquiry
Moore's Propositions
Moore’s Propositions
moral theory analysis
Nelson Mandela
Nicholas F. Stang
Philosopher's Greatness
philosophers
Philosopher’s Greatness
philosophical methodology
Popular Science
Popular Science Monthly
Posterior Analytics Aristotle
Summa Theologiae
Vice Versa
Vincent Van Gogh
virtue
White Head
Young Men

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138936164
  • Weight: 520g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 09 Nov 2017
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This book is inspired by a single powerful question. What is it to be great as a philosopher? No single grand answer is presumed to be possible; instead, rewardingly close studies of philosophical greatness are developed. This is a scholarly yet accessible volume, blending metaphilosophy with the long history of philosophy and traversing centuries and continents. The result is a series of case studies by accomplished scholars, each chapter trying to understand and convey a particular philosopher’s greatness:

Lloyd P. Gerson on Plato

Karyn Lai on Zhuangzi

David Bronstein on Aristotle

Jonardon Ganeri on Buddhaghosa

Jeffrey Hause on Aquinas

Gary Hatfield on Descartes

Karen Detlefsen on du Châtelet

Don Garrett on Hume

Allen Wood on Kant (as a moral philosopher)

Nicholas F. Stang on Kant (as a metaphysician)

Ken Gemes on Nietzsche

Cheryl Misak on Peirce

David Macarthur on Wittgenstein

This also serves a larger philosophical purpose. Might we gain increased clarity about what philosophy is in the first place? After all, in practice we individuate philosophy partly through its greatest practitioners’ greatest contributions.

The book does not discuss every philosopher who has been regarded as great. The point is not to offer a definitive list of The Great Philosophers, but, rather, to learn something about what great philosophy is and might be, from illuminated examples of past greatness.

Stephen Hetherington is Professor of Philosophy at the University of New South Wales. His publications include Epistemology’s Paradox (1992), Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge (2001), How to Know (2011), and Knowledge and the Gettier Problem (2016).