Why It's OK to Eat Meat

Regular price €29.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Dan C. Shahar
animal cruelty
animal farming
Author_Dan C. Shahar
Boar Taint
broader vegetarian movement conscientious omnivorism
Catalytic Converters
Category=QDTQ
Chicken Houses
Conditional Cooperator
conscientious omnivorism
Decibel Meter
Distinctively Human Characteristics
environmental degradation
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
ethical activism theory
ethical reasoning about eating animals
Ethical Vegetarianism
ethical vegetarians
Farrowing Crate
Groundwater Depletion
humane meat practices
Hunt Hare
Inefficacy Thesis
Meat Industry
Meat Industry's Products
Meat Industry’s Products
meat-eating
Moral Cooperation
moral pluralism
philosophical justification
Pork Chops
Pork Industry
public health and diet
Public Health Endangerment
public health risks
Pure Coordination Game
Rotisserie Chickens
Severely Cognitively Disabled
slaughtering
Smog Pollution
Stag Hunt
Universalization Test
Vegetarian Movement
Wo
worker mistreatment

Product details

  • ISBN 9780367172763
  • Weight: 240g
  • Dimensions: 129 x 198mm
  • Publication Date: 10 Nov 2021
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Vegetarians have argued at great length that meat-eating is wrong. Even so, the vast majority of people continue to eat meat, and even most vegetarians eventually give up on their diets. Does this prove these people must be morally corrupt?

In Why It’s OK to Eat Meat, Dan C. Shahar argues the answer is no: it’s entirely possible to be an ethical person while continuing to eat meat—and not just the "fancy" offerings from the farmers' market but also the regular meat we find at most supermarkets and restaurants. Shahar’s examination forcefully echoes vegetarians’ concerns about the meat industry’s impacts on animals, workers, the environment, and public health. However, he shows that the most influential ethical arguments for avoiding meat on the basis of these considerations are ultimately unpersuasive. Instead of insisting we all become vegetarians, Shahar argues each of us has broad latitude to choose which of the world’s problems to tackle, in what ways, and to what extents, and hence people can decline to take up this particular form of activism without doing anything wrong.

Key Features

    • First book-length defense of meat-eating written for a popular audience
    • Punchy, accessible introduction to the multifaceted debate over the ethics of eating meat
    • Includes pioneering new examinations of humane labeling practices
    • Shows why appeals to universalized patterns of behavior can’t vindicate vegetarians’ claims that there’s a duty to avoid meat
    • Develops a novel theory of ethical activism with potential applications to a wide range of other issues

Dan C. Shahar is Assistant Professor of Philosophy—Research at the University of New Orleans and a member of the Urban Entrepreneurship and Policy Institute. He is the winner of the International Society for Environmental Ethics’ 2020 Holmes Rolston III Early Career Essay Prize for Environmental Philosophy and co-editor (with David Schmidtz) of the latest edition of Environmental Ethics: What Really Matters, What Really Works (2018).

More from this author