Why Liberals and Conservatives Clash

Regular price €40.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Bruce Fleming
absolute
Absolute Action
academic discourse analysis
academy
actions
Adolf Hitler
Artistic Elements
Austen's World
Austen’s World
Author_Bruce Fleming
Aye Aye
belief systems analysis
California State University
Category=JHB
Category=JP
Conservative Devotion
Conservative Structure
Conservative Thought
Conservative Worldview
cultural conflict theory
Dance Critics Association
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Football Games
grid
ideology comparison
Liberal Cast
Liberal Grid
Liberal Worldview
light
naval
Naval Academy
Pepperoni Pizza
political polarization
Residual Giddiness
Silk Screened Print
social contract philosophy
Social Contract Theories
Sort
Stand
Straight Men
structural differences in political thought
structure
Things Fall
thought
traffic
worldview
Young Man

Product details

  • ISBN 9780415953535
  • Weight: 450g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 14 Apr 2006
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Why Liberals and Conservatives Clash offers an explanation for the extreme polarization between liberal and conservative that is the hallmark of the American political landscape today. It suggests that liberal thought is intrinsically different from conservative thought, and that each constitutes a self-subsistent world-view with its specific qualities and rules. The book offers a set of guidelines to predict a person's views based on other views s/he holds, given that each world-view is what it is for structural reasons, and is more than merely a sum of discrete positions. It explains, for example, why people who support gay marriage also typically support the woman's right to an early-term abortion, and why people who demand that citizens "support the military" understand this as meaning, support putting members of the military in harm's way. Because liberal thought and conservative thought each constitutes a closed world-view, neither side will ever convince the other in an argument. The most we can hope for is an acknowledgment by each side of the usefulness of the other, a goal Fleming proposes as the most reasonable one for our times.

WhyLiberals and Conservatives Clash makes logical the most striking, and hitherto puzzling feature of the contemporary American political landscape: its acrimony, its air of being an argument between the deaf: neither side understands the other. Fleming suggests this is so because neither side accepts the bases underlying the other's particular positions. We can, however, understand that they are different, and that trying to force the other side into submission won't work. We need to go beyond liberals dismissing conservatives with horror and conservatives dismissing liberals with disgust. Conservatives aren't merely imperfect liberals, they're something else entirely. Liberals aren't merely potential conservatives, they actually think differently.

More from this author