Why We Argue (And How We Should)

Regular price €47.99
A01=Robert Talisse
A01=Scott Aikin
advanced public argument strategies
argument
argumentation theory
Argumentative Exchange
Argumentative Responsibility
Author_Robert Talisse
Author_Scott Aikin
Bad News
Big Answers
Category=GTC
Category=JP
Category=QDTL
Cognitive Command
Cognitive Success
critical thinking pedagogy
death
democratic deliberation
Dialectical Fallacies
Dialectical Situation
Dialecticality Requirement
diff
ect
eff
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
erence
ethical reasoning frameworks
Interlocutor's Argument
Interlocutor's View
Interlocutor’s Argument
Interlocutor’s View
mitt
Modus Tonens
Opponent's View
Opponent’s View
penalty
Plato Principle
political discourse analysis
President Trump
proper
Proper Argument
Proximal Analogue
Public Arguers
Red Pill
Robert B. Talisse
romney
Scott F. Aikin
Seat Belt Laws
social media debate
Straw Man Argument
Straw Man Fallacy
Trump Supporters
Tu Quoque
Tu Quoque Arguments

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138087422
  • Weight: 340g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 28 Aug 2018
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days

Our Delivery Time Frames Explained
2-4 Working Days: Available in-stock

10-20 Working Days: On Backorder

Will Deliver When Available: On Pre-Order or Reprinting

We ship your order once all items have arrived at our warehouse and are processed. Need those 2-4 day shipping items sooner? Just place a separate order for them!

Why We Argue (And How We Should): A Guide to Political Disagreement in an Age of Unreason presents an accessible and engaging introduction to the theory of argument, with special emphasis on the way argument works in public political debate. The authors develop a view according to which proper argument is necessary for one’s individual cognitive health; this insight is then expanded to the collective health of one’s society. Proper argumentation, then, is seen to play a central role in a well-functioning democracy.

Written in a lively style and filled with examples drawn from the real world of contemporary politics, and questions following each chapter to encourage discussion, Why We Argue (And How We Should) reads like a guide for the participation in, and maintenance of, modern democracy. An excellent student resource for courses in critical thinking, political philosophy, and related fields, Why We Argue (And How We Should) is an important contribution to reasoned debate.

What’s New in the Second Edition:

  • Updated examples throughout the book, including examples from the 2016 U.S. election and first years of the Trump presidency;
  • Expanded coverage of dialectical fallacies, including coverage of new types of fallacies and of sites where such fallacies thrive (e.g., cable news, social media);
  • Revised For Further Thought questions and definitions of Key Terms, included at the end of each chapter;
  • The addition of five new chapters:
    • Deep Disagreement
    • Argument by Analogy
    • Argument between the Ads
    • The Owl of Minerva (or weaponizing metalanguage)
    • Argumentative Responsibility and Repair.

Scott F. Aikin is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Vanderbilt University. His previous books include Evidentialism and the Will to Believe (2014) and Epistemology and the Regress Problem (Routledge 2011).

Robert B. Talisse is W. Alton Jones Professor of Philosophy and Professor of Political Science at Vanderbilt University. He is the author of five books, including Engaging Political Philosophy (Routledge 2016), Pluralism and Liberal Politics (Routledge 2011), and Democracy and Moral Conflict (2009).