William James, Moral Philosophy, and the Ethical Life
Regular price
€62.99
14 days return policy
Shipping & Delivery
A32=Amy Kittelstrom
A32=D. Micah Hester
A32=Gregory Eiselein
A32=Guy Axtell
A32=Jacob L. Goodson
A32=John R. Shook
A32=Joseph D. John
A32=Neal A. Tognazzini
A32=Roger Ward
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
American philosophy
American Studies
automatic-update
B01=Jacob L. Goodson
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HBJK
Category=HPQ
Category=JM
Category=NHK
Category=QDTQ
Category=QR
COP=United States
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
ethics
habits
Language_English
moral philosophy
moral theory
PA=Available
pragmatism
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Active
Psychology
radical empiricism
religious studies
softlaunch
utilitarianism
Product details
- ISBN 9781498571081
- Weight: 644g
- Dimensions: 152 x 224mm
- Publication Date: 29 Oct 2019
- Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Paperback
- Language: English
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
Virtue theory, natural law, deontology, utilitarianism, existentialism: these are the basic moral theories taught in “Ethics,” “History of Philosophy,” and “Introduction to Philosophy” courses throughout the United States. When the American philosopher William James (1842 – 1910) find his way into these conversations, there is uncertainty about where his thinking fits. While utilitarianism has become the default position for teaching James’s pragmatism and radical empiricism, this default position fails to address and explain James’s multiple criticisms of John Stuart Mill’s formulaic approach to questions concerning the moral life. Through close readings of James’s writings, the chapters in William James, Moral Philosophy, and the Ethical Life catalogue the ways in whichJames wants to avoid the following: (a) the hierarchies of Christian natural law theory, (b) the moral calculus of Mill’s utilitarianism, (c) the absolutism and principle-ism of Immanuel Kant’s deontology, and (d) the staticity of the virtues found in Aristotle’s moral theory. Elaborating upon and clarifying James’s differences from these dominant moral theories is a crucial feature of this collection. This collection, is not, however, intended to be wholly negative – that is, only describing to readers what James’s moral theory is not. It seeks to articulate the positive features of James’s ethics and moral reasoning: what does it mean to an ethical life, and how should we theorize about morality?
Jacob L. Goodson is assistant professor of philosophy at Southwestern College.
