A01=George W. Goetschius
A01=M. Joan Tash
adolescent engagement
Albemarle Report
Author_George W. Goetschius
Author_M. Joan Tash
bodies
Bristol Social Project
Carnegie United Kingdom Trust
Category=JHB
Child Care Officer
coffee
Coffee Stall
committee
community intervention strategies
Community Wide Programme
Contemporary Society
detached
Detached Worker
Detached Youth Work
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Family Service Unit
Field Work Events
Girl Friend
local
Local Youth Committee
outreach work with marginalised youth
people
Probation Officer
Project Committee Member
qualitative fieldwork methods
Small Friendship Groups
Staff Conference
stall
Unattached Young People
urban sociology research
voluntary
worker
young
Young Man
Youth Employment Office
Youth Employment Officers
Youth Employment Service
youth service evaluation
youth social exclusion
Youth Work
Youth Work Provision
Youth Work Training
Product details
- ISBN 9780415863537
- Weight: 770g
- Dimensions: 138 x 216mm
- Publication Date: 16 May 2013
- Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
- Publication City/Country: GB
- Product Form: Paperback
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
First published in 1998. This is Volume XI of the twelve in the Sociology of Youth and Adolescence series which outlines the problem, approach, and method around a the report of an enquiry into the ways and means of contacting and working with unattached young people in an inner London Borough. The importance of this book, is in the definition of unattachment, and in the perhaps unexpectedly wide range of implications for youth work and the Youth Service that might follow from it. Un attachment is defined as a conflict in expectations between those who offer the service (clubs, youth centres and others in the Youth Service) and those-the young people-who want and need it but who are unable or unwilling to accept it on the conditions on which it is offered. In describing the work that gave rise to this definition, the authors help us to see that the conflict in expectations has its roots in a much wider context than we had been able to see before.
Goetschius George W., Tash M.Joan
