Wronging Rights?

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
Althusserian critique
Anti-traffi Cking
Australian Attorney General
Bare Life
bipeds
Category=GTM
Category=JHB
Category=JP
Category=NH
Category=QD
Category=QDTQ
Category=QDTS
CEDAW
Con Ferences
critical legal studies
culture
Dark Side
Derridean supplement
emancipatory universalism
Enlightenment Utopia
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Ethnic Confl Icts
featherless
Featherless Bipeds
Galley Slaves
Good Life
homo
human
Human Rights
Human Suffering
Humanitarian Interference
identity politics analysis
Infi Nite Justice
kapur
Ontological Destiny
philosophical debates on human rights
postcolonial theory
ratna
Rural Poor
sacer
Secretary Of State
sentimental
Shah Bano
Struc Ture
Symbolic Efficiency
Traffi Cking
UN
Unfi Nished Project
universal
Western Patriarchal Values

Product details

  • ISBN 9780415615297
  • Weight: 570g
  • Dimensions: 138 x 216mm
  • Publication Date: 26 Apr 2011
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This book brings together two of the most powerful and relevant philosophical critiques of human rights: the post-colonialist and the post-Althusserian, its balanced internal structure not just throwing these two critiques together, but actually forcing them to enter into confrontation and dialogue.

The book is organised in three parts: at each end, the post-colonialist and the post-Althusserian critiques are represented by some of their main thinkers (Ratna Kapur, G. C. Spivak, Upendra Baxi; Slavoj Žižek, Jacques Rancière), while in the middle, an American intermezzo (Richard Rorty, Wendy Brown) functions as a genuine Derridian supplement: always already contaminating the purity of the two theoretical schools, preventing their enclosure and, hence, fuelling and complicating further their mutual confrontation. As in any authentic dialogue, the introduction and the conclusion each claim victory for one of the sides by changing the very terms and rules of the dialogue, picturing it as a confrontation between emancipatory universalism and inefficient particularism (from the perspective of the post-Althusserians), or as a split between hypocrisy and truth (from the perspective of the post-colonialists).

Aakash Singh Rathore is Research Professor at Luiss University, Rome. Alex Cistelecan is a doctoral candidate at Luiss University, Rome.